A Secure Overview: Data Galore!

@TeacherToolkitIn 2010, Ross Morrison McGill founded @TeacherToolkit from a simple Twitter account through which he rapidly became the ‘most followed teacher on social media in the UK’. In 2015, he was nominated as one of the ‘500 Most Influential People in Britain’ by The Sunday… Read more about @TeacherToolkitWhether or not you have great relationships with your students, how well do you know their prior data and pathway?This post is offered as a professional development (interview practice) resource and is designed:to test your knowledge of data;to understand students’ prior starting points and pathways;to consider the vast range of teaching strategies and intervention you could deploy to help target vulnerable students.to ensure teachers can identify areas for development and help students make expected progress.The data presented here is entirely fictitious.*Dataset:Take a moment to analyse the data presented below. There are 29 students in one class, so you will need to look between pages 1 and 2 of the table. It is shown this way for easy viewing on this blog.You can also search the table and use the data filter function at the top of the table to rank in ascending or descending order. All the acronyms are explained in the footer.Student DatasetNameAttendanceHome LangaugeEAL stageSEND statusPupil PremiumReading AgeH/M/LKS2 APSStudent N Female75.5%EnglishEYes9.08Low24Student P Male100%English16.04High39Student E Female100%EnglishYes14.01High30Student F Female95.5%EnglishKYes12.10Middle30Student H Male100%English15.02High38Student U Male100%English14.03High36Student T Male100%English16.05High39Student D Female99%English13.10High33Student W Female99.5%English13.10Middle33Student R Male98.5%EnglishKYes13.10High33Student S Female100%EnglishYes14.10High33Student Y Male100%ArabicDKYes13.05High36Student J Female100%BengaliCKYes13.01Middle30Student V Female99.5%ArabicDKYes13.07Middle33Student O Male100%ArabicEYes14.09High36Student Z Male98%UrduAKYes12.09Middle33Student B Female95%SomaliBKYes11.11Low27Student C Male91%SomaliAKYes10.0930Student G Male95.5%ArabicBYes13.02High30Student Q Female100%ArabicBYes12.06Low26Student X Female99%ArabicBKYes12.09Low27Student L Female100%PersianB12.10Low27Student I Male100%PashtoBK12.09Middle30Student AA Male100%PersianCK13.05Middle33Student M Female100%AlbanianAYes11.09Middle30Student K Female100%KurdishBKYes12.09Low27Student AC Female100%TagalogC14.04High33Student AB Female100%PortugueseDYes13.10Low21Student A Male95.5%FrenchD13.08High33This data is entirely fictitious is is for a year 9 class (14 years old). It is offered as a CPD tool for teachers who wish to understand prior and current data better when considering a range of intervention strategies to deploy..Interventions Available:Research (2011) from the University of York* and Sutton Trust and Education Endowment Foundation (2015) suggests that schools are adopting a number of promising strategies to improve outcomes for children living in poverty.This Which-style guide summarised the world’s education evidence about interventions offering teachers best bets of what has worked more effectively in schools together with the relative costs of each approach. This enabled schools to decide how to allocate funding. Unlike other research summaries, the aim was to create a genuinely accessible guide for teachers. (Toolkit, 4 Years On: Lessons for Spending the Pupil Premium, page 16)Here is a list of example interventions you could deploy for students; this list is not exhaustive and some will be more effective than others.Literacy intervention for students with a low reading age.Tailored tests to assess progress.Tutoring in maths and English to support students who are not making progress.Speech and language support for students new to English.Change the student’s location on your seating plan.Provide scaffolding resources and choices.Engage parents and student aspirations.Funding support from Pupil Premium to assist with classroom resources.Support from EWO (Education Welfare Officer) for students with poor attendance.Train teachers to better monitor and use of data.Extending the breadth of the curriculum.Improving feedback between teachers and pupils.Peer-to-peer tutoring schemes for pupils.Additional teachers.Reduce the class size.Questions:Having looked at the data above, what are your immediate thoughts:What interventions would you deploy?To which students? Why?What would you do for pupil premium students?How would you adjust your teaching, planning and marking?What would you do for students with low attendance or low reading ages?How would you adjust your teaching, planning and marking?How can teachers gain a secure overview of every child they teach?How would you measure the impact of the intervention selected?Does data vary between ethnicity or gender? Does it matter?At what point would you re-test students after interventions are put in place?These questions are not exhaustive.Acronyms Explained:The following acronyms are explained in the order presented in the table.Student A (name) and gender.Attendance %Home languageEAL codes: there is a good overview of the new codes in Schools Week.A = new to English; needs a considerable amount of EAL support.B = Early acquisition; have become familiar with some subject specific vocabularyC = Developing competence; requires ongoing EAL support to access curriculum fully.D = Competent; needs some/occasional EAL support to access complex curriculum material and tasks.E = Fluent; operates without EAL support across the curriculum.SEN codes: the K code amalgamates the two codes of A (School Action) and P (School Action Plus) and these codes will gradually be phased over by 2016 where a pupil has been assessed as having significant learning difficulties. Four types of action should be put in place for effective support, assess, plan, do and review. The E code this replaces the current code for statemented pupils (Code S). In line with the SEN Code of Practice, Education, Health and Care plan is Code E.Pupil premium funding.The PPG per pupil for 2015 to 2016 is as follows: Source DfE.Disadvantaged pupilsPupil premium per pupilPupils in year groups reception to year 6 recorded as Ever 6 FSM£1,320Pupils in years 7 to 11 recorded as Ever 6 FSM£935Looked-after children (LAC) defined in the Children Act 1989 as one who is in the care of, or provided with accommodation by, an English local authority£1,900Children who have ceased to be looked after by a local authority in England and Wales because of adoption, a special guardianship order, a child arrangements order or a residence order£1,900Reading ages versus a student’s chronological age (of birth).H/M/L:  Defining Low, Middle and High Attainers. Key stage 2 (KS2) performance tables. Definitions are based on the key stage (KS1) results attained by pupils on completion of the infant phase. Further details here.KS2 APS: Key Stage 2 (10 years old) Average Point Score. The output measure for each pupil is the average point score achieved in the English, mathematics and science KS2 tests. … A pupil’s value added score is calculated by comparing the KS2 performance with the median KS2 performance of other pupils with the same, or similar, prior attainment at KS1. Further details here.I hope you find this a useful exercise.TT.*There may be contradictions of data; please comment and I will adjust.Sources: Related

Read Previous

Training on Your Sofa!

Read Next

Stability in Assessment? No Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *